Skip to content
Wellsprings
greek-epistemologyfeatured in 2 works

The Indemonstrables (Stoic Propositional Logic)

Five argument-forms so self-evidently valid they need no proof — the bedrock on which the Stoics built a logic of whole propositions, not terms.

Where Aristotle's logic reasoned about classes of things ("all men," "some animals"), the Stoics built a rival system reasoning about whole statements joined by "if," "and," "or," and "not." At its heart lay five basic argument-forms called the indemonstrables — patterns like "If the first, then the second; but the first; therefore the second" — held to be so obviously valid that every other valid argument could be reduced to them without further proof. Largely forgotten for centuries, this Stoic propositional logic anticipated the modern logic of connectives by nearly two thousand years.

How it traveled

  1. Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes
    Alexandria · 210
    explains
  2. Vitae philosophorum
    · 240
    explains

Key passages(11)

Vitae philosophorum · Diogenes Laertius

Very high

Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes · Sextus Empiricus

Very high

Vitae philosophorum · Diogenes Laertius

Very high

Vitae philosophorum · Diogenes Laertius

High

Vitae philosophorum · Diogenes Laertius

High

Vitae philosophorum · Diogenes Laertius

High

Vitae philosophorum · Diogenes Laertius

High

Noctes Atticae · Aulus Gellius

High

Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes · Sextus Empiricus

High

Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes · Sextus Empiricus

High
High